# When is a bosonic operator a Hamiltonian?

Preprint · Felix Fischer, Hermann Schulz-Baldes, Daniel Burgarth, Davide Lonigro

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.33545
- Published: 2026-10-24
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33545
- Citations: 0
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33545
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.33545
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Hermitian polynomials in the quadrature operators $x$ and $p$ are the basic ingredients of continuous-variable quantum information, and increasingly exotic ones are now routinely engineered in superconducting circuits and trapped ions. However, such a polynomial need not define unique quantum dynamics: it may define exactly one, none, or an infinite family of physically distinct ones. Such obstructions are invisible to algebraic arguments and can compromise finite-dimensional truncations, which may fail to converge or silently converge to the wrong dynamics. We develop a method, implemented as an algorithm, which decides which case occurs, and how large the family is, from the coefficients alone, with no functional-analytic input from the user. For Gaussian operators the answer is always one; for non-Gaussian ones, a regime continuous-variable quantum computing cannot do without, the other outcomes occur already for simple and physically natural Hamiltonians. We apply the algorithm to operators drawn from the recent literature.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Neutral-Atom & Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing](https://space-kitty.com/topics/atoms-and-ions)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.