# Ambiguous Fits: The Rashomon Effect and Challenges in Scaling Law Estimation

Preprint · Bruno Mlodozeniec, Spencer Frei

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.34514
- Published: 2026-10-25
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34514
- Citations: 0
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34514
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.34514
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Estimating neural scaling laws involves an end-to-end pipeline: designing a scaling recipe, training models across scales, evaluating models on a target metric, and deploying an algorithm to fit a scaling law to the resulting data. This final fitting stage is often treated as routine: standard procedures minimize a non-convex fitting loss using local optimization from a grid of initializations, and return the best solution found. Yet such heuristic searches can fail in two distinct ways: they offer no guarantee of returning a nearly optimal solution, and they obscure whether fundamentally different parameter choices fit the data nearly as well. Indeed, we show that standard scaling law fitting is subject to a Rashomon effect (Breiman, 2001): the sublevel sets of near-minimizers correspond to broad parameter regions whose extrapolations diverge substantially at scale. We resolve these issues with a deterministic branch-and-bound algorithm that guarantees nearly optimal fitting loss and exhaustively maps the near-minimizers to the implied range of scaling curves.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Scaling Laws & Compute-Optimal Training](https://space-kitty.com/topics/scaling-laws)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.