# Safe by Benchmark, Unsafe in Practice: Lessons from 1331 Child-Related AI Incidents

Preprint · Junfeng Jiao, Kevin Chen, Shrestha Mishra, Abhejay Murali, David Atkinson, Shriti Raj, Saleh Afroogh

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.34705
- Published: 2026-10-26
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34705
- Citations: 0
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34705
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.34705
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

AI systems are increasingly present in children's everyday environments: education, entertainment, social networks, and toys. Their safety is typically assessed at the model level, through benchmarks, red-teaming, and content filtering. However, most AI harm taxonomies lack child-specific evidence and under-specify developmental harm and the stakeholder asymmetries unique to minors. Building on prior taxonomies, we construct a child-centered harm taxonomy mapped to sociotechnical failure modes. We curate and code 1331 publicly reported child-related AI incidents, annotating internal and external harm types and the failure mode implicated in each incident. Our analysis reveals which harms are most prevalent in public reporting, how individual-level and population-level harms relate, and which failures are most often coded alongside harm. We find that harm concentrates in representational, dignity-related, and psychological categories, and co-occurs most often with deployment-context, governance, and misuse failures rather than model defects. Harm to an individual child is also frequently linked to population-level harm, reaching children who never interacted with the system. These findings suggest that model-level evaluations, while necessary, cannot by themselves anticipate the harm pathways most often documented for children. We conclude with actionable implications emphasizing mitigations beyond model-level safeguards such as content filtering: age assurance, consent verification for depiction, safety-by-design UX constraints, incident disclosure norms, and auditing regimes targeting developmental risk. Privacy-minimized annotations, a codebook, and documentation are available at https://github.com/The-Responsible-AI-Initiative/KidAID.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [AI Alignment & Safety](https://space-kitty.com/topics/alignment-safety)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.