# Towards Reliably Measuring the Mass-Size Relation of Dark Matter Halos: Impact of projection, miscentering and Eddington bias

Preprint · Charlie T. Mpetha, Benedikt Diemer

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.36531
- Published: 2026-10-27
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36531
- Citations: 0
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36531
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.36531
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

In the conventional spherical overdensity definition of a dark matter halo, masses and radii, e.g. $M\_{200{\\rm m}}$ and $r\_{200{\\rm m}}$, are equivalent. However, halos do exhibit a physical boundary at the splashback radius $r\_{\\rm sp}$, which manifests as a sharp drop in density. Splashback radii are now routinely measured in stacked weak lensing profiles, but the expected trend of decreasing $r\_{\\rm sp}/r\_{200{\\rm m}}$ with mass has not been verified in observed galaxy groups or clusters. In this work, we show that several observational effects conceal the predicted mass-size relation. In particular, we quantify the impact of systematics on the mean density and lensing profiles of mock-observed halo samples, which are created by applying a realistic cluster-finding procedure to dark matter-only simulations. We reproduce the known impact of projection: preferentially observing systems in overdense regions. But, differing from previous works, we show that the same projection effect, combined with scatter in observed luminosities, causes a significant Eddington bias in the derived mass-observable relation and a complex suppression in mean density profiles over all radial scales. The magnitude of this effect is mass-dependent and coupled to the cluster-finding procedure and survey properties, making it challenging to model simply and motivating full forward-modeling of observed group and cluster samples. However, we demonstrate that a simple mitigation approach, effectively a weak lensing mass calibration, does well in approximately recovering the true mass-size relation. Finally, we show that only severe miscentering can bias the measurement of the halo size, but any miscentering can increase the measurement uncertainty.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Dark Matter Searches](https://space-kitty.com/topics/dark-matter)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.