# Channel Selection for Mixture-of-Experts Decoding Needs No Calibration Data

Preprint · Geunhyoung Kim, Sung Ju Hwang

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.37386
- Published: 2026-10-27
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37386
- Citations: 0
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37386
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.37386
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models are bottlenecked by loading routed-expert weights from memory during interactive decoding at small batch sizes. Because most intermediate channels in a routed expert contribute little to any single token, channel selectors predict which channels matter and read only their weights, typically keeping channels above a threshold calibrated on offline data. We show that channel selection needs no calibration data. First, a calibrated threshold does not fix how much a selector reads, because the number of channels passing it varies across inputs; Prox with thresholds calibrated for an 18% read budget actually reads only 12.9% on average across our benchmarks. Second, top-k keeps each token's k highest-scoring channels and needs no calibration data. At the calibrated budget, a selector's top-k version matches or beats its threshold version on the same score in 40 of 43 comparisons at 13% and 18% budgets, including all 23 on generation tasks. The top-k versions also avoid the repetition-loop collapse that calibrated thresholds cause on Gemma 4. Calibrating a threshold thus provides neither of the two things selectors use it for: a known read budget and a consistent accuracy gain at that budget. We furthermore introduce a reader built entirely from the model's weights, which screens channels with a ternary sketch and recovers the skipped ones with a low-rank map. Across three post-trained MoE models, our reader retains 98.1% of full-model accuracy at 17.8% of routed-expert reads, with Triton kernels running MoE blocks 1.60 to 1.90x faster than optimized vLLM at batch one and up to 2.69x at larger batches on the same three models.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [LLM Architectures & Pretraining](https://space-kitty.com/topics/llm-architectures)

Cited in dossiers:
- [LLM Architectures & Pretraining: State of the Field (October 2026)](https://space-kitty.com/dossiers/llm-architectures)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.