# What Actually Matters? A Paired Evaluation of Inference Settings for $π_{0.5}$ on BEHAVIOR-1K

Preprint · Ruben Hammele, Samira Huber, Mohammad Nazeri, Amirreza Payandeh, Alexandyr T. Card, Aaron Nguyen, Anuj Pokhrel, Daeun Song, Xuesu Xiao, Sören Pirk

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.37917
- Published: 2026-10-27
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37917
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37917
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.37917
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offer a promising paradigm for general-purpose household robotics. However, inference and data-collection strategies that have been deployed in smaller-scale settings do not necessarily generalize to large-scale, diverse task suites. To address this gap, we conduct a systematic, paired evaluation of previously proposed inference and data-collection strategies across all 100 tasks. Our evaluation uses a fine-tuned $π\_{0.5}$ model based on the 2025 BEHAVIOR Challenge winner, which achieves a Q-score of 0.39 on the public test set. These results show that proposed strategies do not transfer uniformly to new environments and tasks. Project page, videos, and detailed analysis: https://rubenhammele.github.io/behavior2026

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Robot Learning & Embodied AI](https://space-kitty.com/topics/robotics-embodied)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.