# Structural-Test Geometry as an Inductive Bias for Partially Observable World Models

Preprint · Todd Y. Zhou

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.38903
- Published: 2026-10-28
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38903
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38903
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.38903
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Predictive world-model objectives need not organize latent histories according to distinctions required for later control. With privileged simulator access during training, should response-derived structural information be predicted, decoded, or imposed directly on latent geometry--and how do these choices compare with structured belief distillation? We define posterior-marginalized structural tests whose response distributions induce a pseudometric over histories, then train quotient-preserving (QP) world models by aligning shared latent Euclidean distances to that metric. Across a fixed six-task diagnostic suite, the largest differences appear under held-out structural variation: QP improves planning success by 26.1 points $\[21.5,30.7\]$ over metric decoding and 6.4 points $\[3.8,9.0\]$ over structured belief distillation. On GridWorld, metric decoding accurately recovers held-out structural distances ($ρ=.91$) while its native latent geometry remains more distorted than QP's (paired IQD difference $.22$ $\[.20,.24\]$), showing that relational recoverability and direct geometric alignment can diverge.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.