# Bayesian analysis of Bell inequalities

Article · Asher Peres

- Archive id: arxiv:quant-ph/9905084
- Published: 1999-05-25
- Venue: Fortsch.Phys. 48 (2000) 531-535
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-3978(200005)48:5/7<531::aid-prop531>3.0.co;2-#
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9905084
- Citations: 25
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9905084
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9905084
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Statistical tests are needed to determine experimentally whether a hypothetical theory based on local realism can be an acceptable alternative to quantum mechanics. It is impossible to rule out local realism by a single test, as often claimed erroneously. The \`\`strength'' of a particular Bell inequality is measured by the number of trials that are needed to invalidate local realism at a given confidence level. Various versions of Bell's inequality are compared from this point of view. It is shown that Mermin's inequality for Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states requires fewer tests than the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality or than its chained variants applied to a singlet state, and also than Hardy's proof of nonlocality.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Quantum Foundations](https://space-kitty.com/topics/quantum-foundations)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.