Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis

Bas Hensen, Norbert Kalb, Machiel Blok, A. Dréau, Andreas Reiserer, R. F. L. Vermeulen, Raymond N. Schouten, Matthew Markham, Daniel J. Twitchen, Kenneth Goodenough, David Elkouss, Stephanie Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, Ronald Hanson

View at source ↗PDF ↗Article95 citations

Abstract

The recently reported violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electronic spins in diamonds (Hensen et al., Nature 526, 682-686) provided the first loophole-free evidence against local-realist theories of nature. Here we report on data from a second Bell experiment using the same experimental setup with minor modifications. We find a violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality of $2.35 \pm 0.18$, in agreement with the first run, yielding an overall value of $S = 2.38 \pm 0.14$. We calculate the resulting $P$-values of the second experiment and of the combined Bell tests. We provide an additional analysis of the distribution of settings choices recorded during the two tests, finding that the observed distributions are consistent with uniform settings for both tests. Finally, we analytically study the effect of particular models of random number generator (RNG) imperfection on our hypothesis test. We find that the winning probability per trial in the CHSH game can be bounded knowing only the mean of the RNG bias, implying that our experimental result is robust for any model underlying the estimated average RNG bias.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.

Record

Archive ID
arxiv:1603.05705
Published
Aug 11, 2016
Updated
Apr 1, 2016
Venue
Scientific Reports
DOI
10.1038/srep30289
arXiv
1603.05705
PubMed
27509823
Categories
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
License
cc-by
Provenance
openalex+arxiv

Topics