Pseudospectral Shattering, the Sign Function, and Diagonalization in Nearly Matrix Multiplication Time

Abstract

We exhibit a randomized algorithm which given a matrix $A\in \mathbb{C}^{n\times n}$ with $\|A\|\le 1$ and $δ>0$, computes with high probability an invertible $V$ and diagonal $D$ such that $\|A-VDV^{-1}\|\le δ$ using $O(T_{MM}(n)\log^2(n/δ))$ arithmetic operations, in finite arithmetic with $O(\log^4(n/δ)\log n)$ bits of precision. Here $T_{MM}(n)$ is the number of arithmetic operations required to multiply two $n\times n$ complex matrices numerically stably, known to satisfy $T_{MM}(n)=O(n^{ω+η})$ for every $η>0$ where $ω$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication (Demmel et al., Numer. Math., 2007). Our result significantly improves the previously best known provable running times of $O(n^{10}/δ^2)$ arithmetic operations for diagonalization of general matrices (Armentano et al., J. Eur. Math. Soc., 2018), and (with regards to the dependence on $n$) $O(n^3)$ arithmetic operations for Hermitian matrices (Dekker and Traub, Lin. Alg. Appl., 1971). It is the first algorithm to achieve nearly matrix multiplication time for diagonalization in any model of computation (real arithmetic, rational arithmetic, or finite arithmetic), thereby matching the complexity of other dense linear algebra operations such as inversion and $QR$ factorization up to polylogarithmic factors. The proof rests on two new ingredients. (1) We show that adding a small complex Gaussian perturbation to any matrix splits its pseudospectrum into $n$ small well-separated components. In particular, this implies that the eigenvalues of the perturbed matrix have a large minimum gap, a property of independent interest in random matrix theory. (2) We give a rigorous analysis of Roberts' Newton iteration method (Roberts, Int. J. Control, 1980) for computing the sign function of a matrix in finite arithmetic, itself an open problem in numerical analysis since at least 1986.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.