Non-Planar Coil Winding Angle Optimization for Compatibility with Non-Insulated High-Temperature Superconducting Magnets

Abstract

The rapidly emerging technology of high-temperature superconductors (HTS) opens new opportunities for the development of non-planar non-insulated HTS magnets. This type of HTS magnet offers attractive features via its simplicity, robustness, and is well-suited for modest size steady-state applications such as a mid-scale stellarator. In non-planar coil applications the HTS tape may be subject to severe minor-axis bending strain ($ε_{bend}$), torsional strains ($ε_{tor}$) and transverse magnetic field components ($B_\perp$), all of which can limit the magnet operating space. A novel method of winding angle optimization is here presented to overcome these limitations. Essentially, this method: 1) calculates the peak εbend and B\perp for arbitary winding angle along an input coil filamentary trajectory, 2) defines a cost function including both, and then 3) uses tensioned splines to define a winding angle that reduces $ε$tor and optimizes the εbend and $B_\perp$ cost function. As strain limits are present even without $B_\perp$, this optimization is able to provide an assessment of the minimimum buildable size of an arbitrary non-planar non-insulating HTS coil. This optimization finds that for standard 4 mm wide HTS tapes the minimum size coils of the existing HSX, NCSX, and W7-X stellarator geometries are around 0.3 - 0.5 m in radius. For coils larger than this size, permitting a finite (yet tolerable) strain allows reduction of $B_\perp$. This enables a reduction of the HTS tape length required to achieve a given design magnetic field or equivalently an increase in the achievable magnetic field for fixed HTS tape length. The distinct considerations for optimizing a stellarator coilset to further ease compatibility with non-insulated HTS magnets are also discussed.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.