Abstract
It has very recently been claimed that the neutrino-assisted early dark energy model -- a promising resolution of the Hubble tension that can ameliorate the theoretical fine-tuning and coincidence problems that plague other theories -- does not provide natural or cosmologically interesting results. In this short paper, we show that these conclusions are incorrect for three reasons. First, we identify errors in the calculations. Second, we dispute the definition in of what constitutes an 'interesting' and 'natural' model. Finally, we demonstrate that the conclusions of were arrived at without fully exploring the full parameter space of the model. Neutrino-assisted early dark energy remains a natural and interesting potential resolution of the Hubble tension that merits further study.
Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.
Record
- Archive ID
- arxiv:2302.09091
- Published
- Feb 17, 2023
- arXiv
- 2302.09091
- Categories
- astro-ph.CO, hep-ph
- Provenance
- arxiv