Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Whose Culture, Whose Values, Whose Perspectives?

Kristian González Barman, Simon Lohse, Henk de Regt

Preprint: not peer reviewed. Results may change in later versions.

Abstract

We argue for the epistemic and ethical advantages of pluralism in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in the context of Large Language Models (LLM). Drawing on social epistemology and pluralist philosophy of science, we suggest ways in which RHLF can be made more responsive to human needs and how we can address challenges along the way. The paper concludes with an agenda for change, i.e. concrete, actionable steps to improve LLM development.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.

Record

Archive ID
arxiv:2407.17482
Published
Jul 2, 2024
Updated
Jan 17, 2025
Venue
González Barman, K., Lohse, S. & de Regt, H.W. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs: Whose Culture, Whose Values, Whose Perspectives?. Philos. Technol. 38, 35 (2025)
DOI
10.1007/s13347-025-00861-0
arXiv
2407.17482
Categories
cs.CY, cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.HC
Provenance
arxiv