Late-Time Alleviation of the Hubble Tension in CPL Cosmology with Massive Neutrinos via Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Abstract

We present a Bayesian analysis of the Hubble constant using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), applied to the standard wCDM model and its dynamical extension via the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) parametrization, with and without a free summed neutrino mass $Σm_ν$. Embedding the background Friedmann equation into a Bayesian PINN, we reconstruct $H(z)$ in a data-driven, physically consistent way while propagating epistemic uncertainty. Combining Cosmic Chronometers, DESI DR2 BAO, and Pantheon+ supernovae with Planck 2018 CMB distance priors, we quantify the Hubble tension against Planck and SH0ES (R22). For wCDM, BAO-dominated combinations favor lower $H_0$, easing the Planck tension at the cost of a larger SH0ES discrepancy. Letting the equation of state evolve within CPL shifts $H_0$ upward and consistently favors a mildly quintessence-like $w_0 \gtrsim -1$ with negative $w_a$, pointing to a slowly evolving, non-phantom dark energy component. Adding a free $Σm_ν$ stabilizes $H_0$ between $69.7$ and $71.6~\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$, bounds $Σm_ν\lesssim 0.16$--$0.28~\mathrm{eV}$ ($2σ$), and reduces the SH0ES tension below $1.8σ$ (down to $0.83σ$) while the Planck tension persists at $1.6$--$2.8σ$. AIC and BIC both favor CPL+$Σm_ν$ despite its extra parameters, arguing against overfitting. A full-CMB MCMC cross-check via Cobaya, including CMB lensing, reproduces the BPINN posteriors -- including the neutrino-mass bound -- within 1--2$σ$ at a fraction of the cost. A mildly evolving dark energy component combined with sub-eV neutrino masses thus substantially eases, though does not fully resolve, the Hubble tension, supporting Bayesian PINNs as an efficient, physically consistent tool for precision cosmology beyond $Λ$CDM.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.