The X-ray weakness of Little Red Dots and JWST-selected AGN: comparison with local AGN in different accretion regimes

Abstract

We investigate the origin of the observed X-ray weakness in high z LRDs and other JWST-selected broad line AGN by comparing their X-ray and optical properties with those of a diverse sample of low z AGN, including super-Eddington accreting massive black holes (SEAMBHs), NLS1s, and type I AGN from large surveys. We examine the relations between X-ray luminosity, broad Hα line luminosity, Eddington ratio, bolometric luminosity and X-ray-to-bolometric luminosity correction, and explore whether high z sources may represent analogues of local highly accreting systems. While a few LRDs and JWST-selected AGN are consistent with the SEAMBHs population in the $L_x/L_{Hα}$ versus $λ_{Edd}$ plane, most lie below it, suggesting either more extreme accretion conditions, suppressed coronal emission or heavy obscuration. We identify an anti-correlation between $L_x/L_{Hα}$ and $λ_{Edd}$ in the low z, high accreting subsample, consistent with theoretical expectations of slim-disc accretion. We further show that, for SEAMBHs, $Hα$-based bolometric luminosities underestimate SED-based values even after dust correction. We find that SEAMBHs, LRDs, and JWST-selected AGN occupy a similar high-$κ_{bol,x}$ regime, indicating that the relative deficit of X-ray emission compared to the bolometric output could potentially support the view that soft X-ray spectra arising from relatively cold coronae is a common feature of highly accreting systems across cosmic time. Our results are consistent with the idea that the observed X-ray weakness of LRDs and JWST-selected AGN may be linked to the physics of highly accreting SMBHs. Moreover, observational limitations at high z, including instrumental sensitivity and the steep X-ray spectra expected for highly accreting systems, likely further suppress the detected X-ray signal.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.