DAG Projections: Reducing Distance and Flow Problems to DAGs

Abstract

We show that every directed graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges admits a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with $m^{1+o(1)}$ edges, called a DAG projection, that can either $(1+1/\text{polylog} (n))$-approximate distances between all pairs of vertices $(s,t)$ in $G$, or $n^{o(1)}$-approximate maximum flow between all pairs of vertex subsets $(S,T)$ in $G$. Previous similar results suffer a $Ω(\log n)$ approximation factor for distances [Assadi, Hoppenworth, Wein, STOC'25] [Filtser, SODA'26] and, for maximum flow, no prior result of this type is known. Our DAG projections admit $m^{1+o(1)}$-time constructions. Further, they admit almost-optimal parallel constructions, i.e., algorithms with $m^{1+o(1)}$ work and $m^{o(1)}$ depth, assuming the ones for approximate shortest path or maximum flow on DAGs, even when the input $G$ is not a DAG. DAG projections immediately transfer results on DAGs, usually simpler and more efficient, to directed graphs. As examples, we improve the state-of-the-art of $(1+ε)$-approximate distance preservers [Hoppenworth, Xu, Xu, SODA'25] and single-source minimum cut [Cheung, Lau, Leung, SICOMP'13], and obtain simpler construction of $(n^{1/3},ε)$-hop-set [Kogan, Parter, SODA'22] [Bernstein, Wein, SODA'23] and combinatorial max flow algorithms [Bernstein, Blikstad, Saranurak, Tu, FOCS'24] [Bernstein, Blikstad, Li, Saranurak, Tu, FOCS'25]. Finally, via DAG projections, we reduce major open problems on almost-optimal parallel algorithms for exact single-source shortest paths (SSSP) and maximum flow to easier settings: (1) From exact directed SSSP to exact undirected ones, (2) From exact directed SSSP to $(1+1/\text{polylog}(n))$-approximation on DAGs, and (3) From exact directed maximum flow to $n^{o(1)}$-approximation on DAGs.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.