Functional Connectivity-Guided Band Selection for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces

Abstract

Reliable control in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces (MI-BCIs) requires the precise decoding of user-specific neural rhythms, which vary significantly across individuals. The Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm is a cornerstone of MI-BCI decoding, yet its performance depends strongly on the spectral range of the input EEG data. Although Filter Bank CSP (FBCSP) extends this as a data-driven decoding framework, its frequency sub-bands are predefined rather than selected using subject-specific physiological criteria. This paper presents a proof-of-concept study of static functional connectivity (FC)-guided band selection for MI-BCI, demonstrated using a conventional FBCSP-based pipeline. The proposed method identifies the most discriminative spectral bands by calculating phase-based connectivity across four sensorimotor channels using wPLI, PLV, and PLI. Nine bands in a 4-40 Hz filter bank are ranked by the effect size of their hemispheric coupling differences and pruned to the top K bands for feature extraction and classification via FBCSP and a Support Vector Regressor. This framework was tested for K values ranging from 1 to 8 across the BCI Competition IV-2a (n = 9) and OpenBMI (n = 54) datasets. Performance was benchmarked against standard nine-band FBCSP and random ablation to determine the minimum number of bands (K*) required to maintain accuracy within a 2% baseline equivalence zone. Results show FC-guided selection can outperform random ablation and achieve near-baseline performance while reducing required CSP fits by 22.2% to 77.8%. PLV enables the most aggressive dimensionality reduction by prioritizing the μ and low-\b{eta} ranges, while wPLI demonstrates superior inter-session robustness by mitigating volume conduction. These findings establish FC-guided selection as a principled and interpretable alternative to heuristic filter bank designs.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.