Little red dots as obscured little blue dots: relative abundances, luminosities, and black-hole masses

Abstract

We test whether "little red dots'' (LRDs) are the dust-reddened, high-inclination counterparts of bluer compact broad-line active galactic nuclei, here referred to as "little blue dots'' (LBDs), by modeling their relative number densities and luminosities. Using the observed UV luminosity function (LF) of broad-line active galactic nuclei (BLAGNs) at z>4 as the parent distribution, we forward-model the effects of accretion rate, anisotropic emission, orientation, and dust obscuration within our super-Eddington unification framework. We show that a model with a geometrically thick accretion flow and a dusty circumnuclear cloud population reproduces the LRD LF over the luminosity range currently constrained by JWST. The predicted LRD/BLAGN fraction is strongly luminosity dependent, rising from ~3% at M_{1500}=-21 mag to a peak value of ~20% near M_{1500}=-19. The model also predicts a larger apparent LRD fraction at rest-frame optical wavelengths, reaching 27% at M_{4500}=-20 mag and 39% at M_{6500}=-21. The fiducial solution adopts a baseline host extinction A_V^{host}=0.5 mag, a characteristic per-cloud nuclear extinction < A_V^c >=3.0 mag, and a gray R_V=5.5 attenuation curve, and yields a mean dust covering factor < C_{dust} > ~0.23. This value is conditional on the adopted dust prescription, since lower per-cloud extinction can be compensated by a larger covering factor. These results may support an orientation-based unification of little dots and identify the LRD LF as a key demographic test of rapid accretion onto infant black holes at cosmic dawn. Within this same framework, UV-selected LRDs are predicted to host systematically more massive black holes than unobscured LBDs, not because they represent a distinct parent population, but because dust attenuation preferentially removes lower-mass obscured systems from the observed UV sample.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.