Deterministic Monotone Min-Plus Product and Convolution

Abstract

The Monotone Min-Plus Product problem is a useful primitive that has seen many algorithmic applications over the past decade. In this problem, we are given two $n\times n$ integer matrices $A$ and $B$, where each row of $B$ is a monotone non-decreasing sequence of integers from $\{1,\dots,n\}$, and the goal is to compute their Min-Plus product, defined as the $n\times n$ matrix $C$ with $C_{i,j} = \min_{k}\{A_{i,k} + B_{k,j}\}$. The fastest known algorithm for this task [Chi, Duan, Xie, and Zhang, STOC'22] runs in $n^{(ω+3)/2+o(1)} = O(n^{2.686})$ time, significantly improving over the brute-force cubic algorithm. However, its main disadvantage is that it requires randomization, which is then inherited by all downstream applications. Our main result is a deterministic algorithm for Monotone Min-Plus product with the same time complexity $n^{(ω+3)/2+o(1)} = O(n^{2.686})$ as its randomized counterpart, improving upon the previous deterministic bound $O(n^{2.875})$ [Gu, Polak, Vassilevska Williams, and Xu, ICALP'21]. Our derandomization also applies to previously studied extensions and variants (e.g., [Dürr, IPL'23]), including rectangular matrices, bounded range $[n^μ]$, and column-monotone matrices. As an immediate consequence, we derandomize state-of-the-art algorithms for multiple problems, including Language Edit Distance, RNA Folding, Optimum Stack Generation, unweighted Tree Edit Distance, Batched Range Mode, and Approximate All-Pairs Shortest Paths. Our techniques also yield a deterministic algorithm for the Monotone Min-Plus Convolution problem that runs in $n^{1.5+o(1)}$ time, nearly matching the best known randomized time complexity $\widetilde{O}(n^{1.5})$ [Chi, Duan, Xie, and Zhang, STOC'22]. This algorithm can be used to derandomize state-of-the-art algorithms for Jumbled Indexing for binary strings and several variants of Knapsack.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.