Layer-Based Width for PAFP

Abstract

The Path Avoiding Forbidden Pairs problem (PAFP) asks whether, in a directed graph $G$ with terminals $s,t$ and a set $\mathcal{F}$ of forbidden vertex pairs, there is an $s$-$t$ path that contains at most one endpoint from each forbidden pair. We initiate the study of PAFP through a layer-based width measure. Our first focus is the union digraph $G\cup\mathcal{F}$, obtained by adding to $G$ one arc per forbidden pair, oriented according to a fixed reachability-compatible order. Let the BFS layer $L_d$ be all vertices at directed shortest-path distance $d$ from $s$, where the BFS-width from $s$ is $\max_d |L_d|$. We show if $G\cup\mathcal{F}$ has BFS-width $b$ from $s$ and only $β$ arcs going from a later BFS layer to an earlier one, then PAFP is FPT parameterized by $b+β$. The backward-arc hypothesis is essential: we show PAFP remains NP-complete when the union digraph is a DAG with BFS-width 2. We also show if the input DAG has BFS-width at most $2$ and only $k$ backward input arcs, then PAFP can be decided in $2^k |I|^{O(1)}$ time, with unrestricted forbidden pairs. This width-$2$ result is tight: inspection of a classical reduction shows NP-completeness on input DAGs of BFS-width $3$ with no backward input arcs. Moreover, we study exact-length layers in the input graph, where the $d$-th layer consists of the vertices reachable from $s$ by a directed path of length exactly $d$. For DAGs of exact-length width at most $2$, we show PAFP is polynomial-time decidable by a 2-SAT encoding of fixed-length paths. This bound is tight: the same classical reduction yields NP-completeness on DAGs of exact-length width $3$. Unlike previously known polynomial-time regimes for PAFP, which restrict the forbidden-pair set in order to obtain tractability, our two input-graph tractability results allow unrestricted forbidden pairs and input graphs with exponentially many $s$-$t$ paths.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.