Strong Conflict-Free Vertex-Connection via Twin Cover: Kernelization and Chromatic Bounds

Abstract

A vertex-coloring of a connected graph $G$ is a strong conflict-free vertex-connection coloring if every two distinct vertices are joined by a shortest path on which some color appears exactly once. The minimum number of colors in such a coloring is the strong conflict-free vertex-connection number $\operatorname{svcfc}(G)$. We study this problem under the parameter twin cover. Let $X$ be a twin cover of $G$ of size $t$, and let $k$ be the target number of colors. In our first result, given $(G,k)$ together with a twin cover $X$, we reduce in polynomial time to an equivalent annotated instance on at most $\max\{2,t+(t+1)k2^{t+k-1}\}$ vertices. Hence the annotated version of Strong CFVC Number, in which a twin cover is supplied as part of the input, is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $t+k$. Using this bound, we then obtain a kernel parameterized by $\operatorname{tc}(G)+k$; in particular, for every fixed $k$, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the twin-cover number alone. In our second result, we prove every connected graph $G$ with twin cover $X$ of size $t$ satisfies $χ(G)\le \operatorname{svcfc}(G)\le χ(G)+t$. More generally, if $Y\subseteq X$ intersects every shortest path of length at least $3$, then $\operatorname{svcfc}(G)\le χ(G)+|Y|$. We also derive an exact expression for the chromatic number on graphs of bounded twin-cover number: for every proper coloring $\varphi$ of $G[X]$, the minimum number of colors needed to extend $\varphi$ to all of $G$ is $K_\varphi=\max_{S\subseteq X}(|\varphi(S)|+m(S))$, and hence $χ(G)=\min_{\varphi\text{ proper on }G[X]} K_\varphi$. Our results provide the first evidence that twin cover is a useful parameter for strong conflict-free vertex-connection and show that, once a twin cover is fixed, the remaining difficulty is concentrated in a bounded additive gap above the chromatic number.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.