Testing loop quantum gravity through EHT observations of M87* and Sgr A* using rotating holonomy-corrected black holes

Abstract

The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has provided a new tool for testing the strong-field regime of gravity by imaging the shadows of M87* and Sgr A*. These observations provide the first real opportunity to test whether quantum gravity, specifically loop quantum gravity, leaves observable imprints on spacetime. We use the EHT observations of M87* and Sgr A* to examine the observational signs of rotating holonomy--corrected black holes (RHCBHs). We discover that, in comparison to the typical Kerr black hole, the quantum correction parameter $b$ increases the size of the black hole shadow. As the deviation parameter $b$ increases in RHCBH, the prograde photon orbits shift outward, indicating a weaker effective gravitational field near the central region. We find that photon rings continue to exist in the parameter range $b_E \leq b \leq b_p$, due to the presence of unstable circular photon orbits. We apply the Kumar--Ghosh method based on the shadow observables: the shadow area $A$ and the oblateness $D$ that together allow a unique determination of the spin parameter $a$ and the quantum correction parameter $b$. At $θ_o=17$\textdegree~, the angular diameter bound of M87$^{*}$ yields $b \leq 0.1319\,M$ at $a = 0\,$ and $b \leq 0.421\,M$ at $a = 0.784\,M$, while at $θ_o=50$\textdegree~, the angular diameter bound of Sgr A$^{*}$ yields $b \leq 0.5764\,M$ at $a = 0\,$ and $b \leq 0.7482\,M$ at $a = 0.6253\,M$ the Sgr~A$^{*}$. Our results show that nonzero values of the holonomy correction parameter are consistent with current EHT data, indicating that RHCBHs provide viable alternatives to the classical Kerr geometry in the strong-gravity regime and are strong astrophysical black hole candidates.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.