Hubble tension in k-essence: Evidence for robust tension alleviation

Abstract

The Hubble tension has come to stay as a major problem in modern cosmology as it continues to plague the standard cosmological model ($Λ$CDM). As one of the viable, self-consistent dark energy theories, k-essence involves nontrivial self-interactions that can modify the background expansion beyond recombination; thereby impacting the sound horizon to last scattering, and hence, the inferred value of the Hubble constant. We examine this tension in two physically motivated k-essence models, dilaton and tachyon, using datasets from Planck and late-Universe probes including Pantheon+SH0ES, cosmic chronometer (CC), Supernova Cosmology Project Union compilation (Union3), Dark Energy Survey Year~5 (DESY5), and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) measurements. While $Λ$CDM exhibits inconsistent tension inferences, both k-essence models exhibit a substantial tension alleviation that is robust against the inclusion of the independent late-Universe cosmological datasets, giving consistent tension reduction irrespective of whether the observations are supernovae (Pantheon+SH0ES, Union3, DESY5) alone or in combination with cosmic chronometers (CC) and baryon acoustic oscillation measurements (DESI). The combined late-Universe dataset leads to only $0.14σ$ and $0.69σ$ offsets from the Planck prediction in the dilaton and tachyon models, respectively, compared to $5.89σ$ tension in $Λ$CDM. Both models demonstrate that the inferred tension alleviation is a stable, intrinsic consequence of the underlying k-essence dynamics rather than of model fine tuning: model parameters remain unchanged across datasets. The results establish that the apparent Hubble tension is not an unavoidable feature of late-Universe cosmology but depends critically on the description of dark energy.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.