Optimal stimulation sites are not the most affected: personalised models of resting-state fMRI in Alzheimer's disease

Abstract

Resting-state functional connectivity (FC) is altered in Alzheimer's disease (AD), widely regarded as a distributed network process; whether its signature reduces to a few focal sites has not been tested causally, a question central to targeted neuromodulation. We fit subject-specific, cross-subject-identifiable models whose free-running dynamics reproduce those of each individual patient. The fitted model parameters classify AD from controls at modest accuracy, below that of structural atrophy; we build on the functional model nonetheless, because dynamics, not tissue loss, are what stimulation can act on. Changing a virtual patient's model connectivity toward the control template reverts its AD classification, establishing in silico that the disease signature is correctable, yet the required correction is intrinsically distributed: a coordinated, multi-site change of the model connectivity that no single-node edit reproduces. Where, then, should a physically realisable focal drive act? A single-site drive at the node whose connectivity is most altered fails to revert the classification even at supra-physiological amplitudes, whereas selecting each patient's site by its effect on the disease discriminant achieves complete, individualised reclassification from one site, and a real-time closed-loop controller reaches comparable efficacy at lower dose using only causally available information. Optimal targets are cortical and heterogeneous: the site to stimulate is not where connectivity is most altered but where the network is most therapeutically responsive.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.