Density-preserving core-Einasto black holes with Event Horizon Telescope bounds

Abstract

A Newtonian halo density does not uniquely determine a relativistic spacetime, and the resulting completion ambiguity can dominate predicted horizon-scale signals. We make this dependence explicit for the feedback-cored Einasto profile calibrated on FIRE-2 simulations. In Schwarzschild gauge, the Einstein equations give an asymptotically flat, density-preserving geometry supported by an effective anisotropic fluid; no microscopic description of collisionless dark matter is assumed. By contrast, a commonly used rotation-curve completion replaces the finite seed core by an inverse-square source cusp. For the density-preserving solution we derive the enclosed mass in closed form, obtain a sharp one-horizon criterion and the extremal boundaries of a three-horizon phase, and establish the fixed-halo first law. More generally, the leading fractional shift of a spherical black-hole shadow is the environmental mass enclosed within the vacuum photon sphere divided by the central black-hole mass. Applying this result to published Event Horizon Telescope shadow-deviation summaries gives illustrative one-sided 95\% credible limits of $4.8\times10^{23}\,\Msun\,{\rm pc}^{-3}$ for $\sgr$ and $4.1\times10^{17}\,\Msun\,{\rm pc}^{-3}$ for $\mseven$, far above realistic smooth-halo densities. A Milky-Way calibration predicts a fractional shadow shift of $1.7\times10^{-25}$, whereas the rotation-curve completion gives a shift 19 orders of magnitude larger for the same galactic inputs. A covariant polarized thin-disk calculation shows the same weak-core suppression. Thus current horizon-scale images do not constrain a smooth kiloparsec-scale core-Einasto halo; an observable environmental signal would instead require a compact inner component or a physically different relativistic source.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.