Disorder-tuned crossing of monopole and conventional pairing instabilities in multi-Weyl semimetals

Abstract

We study how non-magnetic impurity scattering affects the emergence and possible coexistence of pairing instabilities in a two-node multi-Weyl semimetal. Within an explicitly specified projected impurity kernel---valley diagonal and momentum independent across each Fermi pocket, the leading behaviour of non-magnetic disorder in the small-pocket window $q^{\max}_{\rm intra}ξ_{\rm dis}\ll1\ll|2\mathbf Q|ξ_{\rm dis}$, treated at leading order in Born and Abrikosov--Gor'kov theory---quenched disorder tunes the leading pairing instability from a topologically nontrivial monopole channel to a conventional ($s$-wave) one, extending our earlier clean-system analysis into the disordered regime. A Born self-energy calculation in the chiral band basis then gives: (i) a band-isotropic conventional channel that is Anderson protected against intra-node scalar disorder ($η_s=1$), introduced phenomenologically at the projected-band level; solving the competition for arbitrary $η_s$ yields the crossing criterion $(1-η_s)/(1-η_m)<T_{c0}^{(s)}/T_{c0}^{(m)}$, so the mechanism tolerates substantial loss of conventional-channel protection; and (ii) a rank-one monopole sector fixing $f_m$ as the exact eigenfunction with $η_m(J)=1/(J+2)$, exact given that kernel. The crossing location in $Γ_N/T_{c0}^{(m)}$ is set by $η_m(J)$, $η_s$, and $r=T_{c0}^{(s)}/T_{c0}^{(m)}$. From the clean projected BdG Hamiltonian the pure monopole nodes carry Berry charge $\pm J$, distinct from the gapped conventional solution; the clean nodal thermodynamics is charge-dependent, $N_{\rm SC}(E)\propto E^{2/J}$ and $C\propto T^{1+2/J}$, and the residual density of states shows a threshold only for $J=1$. The crossing lies in the moderately metallic regime, $μ/Γ_N\simeq11$--$14$ for the illustrative $T_{c0}^{(m)}/μ=0.133$ used in the figures.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.