Early against Late: A contrast on dark energy in the light of DESI DR2

Abstract

Recent findings from Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements, combined with Type Ia supernovae and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, suggest potential parameter-level deviations from $Λ\text{CDM}$. However, parameter exclusions omit prior-volume penalties, whereas Bayesian evidence uncovers a stark dichotomy between early- and late-time dynamics. To quantify this effect, we perform a Bayesian model comparison that explicitly accounts for the cosmological epoch of dark energy dynamics, contrasting two schemes acting in opposite epochs of cosmic history: pre-recombination Early Dark Energy (EDE) and late-time Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL), both measured against a baseline $Λ$CDM. We validate the learned harmonic-mean estimator against UltraNest (at background level) before applying it to the CMB analysis. Background-only data already disfavor both extensions, yielding {$\ln B_{Λ\text{CDM},\text{EDE}} = 1.48 \pm 0.18$ and $\ln B_{Λ\text{CDM},\text{CPL}} = 2.36 \pm 0.24$}. Including CMB sharpens this result: {EDE is very strongly rejected ($\ln B_{Λ\text{CDM},\text{EDE}} \approx 12.61 \pm 0.17$)} with its early-time fraction constrained to $10^3\,Ω_e^{\rm EDE} = 2.0^{+0.6}_{-1.0}$, whereas CPL remains only mildly disfavored ($\ln B_{Λ\text{CDM},\text{CPL}} \approx 2.34 \pm 0.18$), even though 2D parameter posteriors for both models display a multi-$σ$ deviation from $Λ\text{CDM}$. Thus, Bayesian evidence weakens reported preferences for dark energy dynamics, with the impact depending on the cosmic epoch involved, confirmed by our functional reconstructions of $w_{\rm de}(z)$ and $Ω_{\rm de}(z)$ from posterior samples.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.