Dasgupta's Hierarchical Clustering Objective: Geometry and the Price of the Cardinality Constraint

Abstract

The cost of a hierarchical clustering can be represented by an ultrametric whose lowest-common-ancestor labels are cluster cardinalities. We relate this known representation to the shortest-path geometry of a similarity graph. For a connected support graph $G$, let $d_G$ be its unit-length shortest-path metric and let the edge weights enter only the objective. We prove that the shifted Dasgupta optimum is exactly the minimum edge-weighted cost of a cardinality-realizable ultrametric that dominates $d_G$. Connectedification lemmas put this problem and its freely labeled dominating-ultrametric relaxation on the same class of connected binary hierarchies, labeled respectively by cardinality and graph diameter. As a sharp baseline, we determine the exact worst-case price of cardinality realizability: on every $n$-vertex instance the ratio of the two optima is at most $(2n-1)/3$, with equality on the unweighted complete graph; the sharp factor for the standard unshifted objective is $2(n+1)/3$. Our principal structural result bounds this gap by a hereditary weighted fragmentation profile defined through connected balanced cuts. Uniform local control gives an $O(\log n)$ gap, polynomial decay gives a constant gap, and the logarithmic order is tight even for unweighted trees of maximum degree $3$. On locally regular bounded-degree trees, the hierarchy can be constructed in $O(n\log n)$ time. An energy decomposition and a geometric density bound provide supporting instance-sensitive estimates. Thus the cardinality label has an unavoidable linear worst case but admits substantially smaller bounds on natural sparse graph classes.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.