A Better-Than-$3$ Approximation Algorithm for Demand Matching via Knapsack Intersection LP and Contention Resolution

Abstract

The demand matching problem generalizes both the knapsack problem and the $b$-matching problem. In this problem, each edge of a graph has a demand and a weight, and each vertex has a capacity. The goal is to find a maximum weight subset of edges such that, at each vertex, the total demand of the incident selected edges does not exceed the vertex capacity. Parekh [IPCO 2011] proved that, if each edge is individually feasible, the natural LP relaxation for demand matching has integrality gap at most $3$, yielding a $3$-approximation algorithm. This bound is tight for the natural LP relaxation, matching the lower bound of Shepherd and Vetta [Math. Oper. Res. 2007]. We present a randomized $(3/2 + \sqrt{2} + \varepsilon) \approx (2.914 + \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the demand matching problem for every $\varepsilon > 0$, giving the first approximation ratio strictly better than $3$. For bipartite graphs, we obtain a randomized $(2 + \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for every $\varepsilon > 0$. Both algorithms run in time polynomial in $1/\varepsilon$ and the input length. Our algorithms use a strengthened LP relaxation based on intersecting the integral knapsack polytopes associated with the vertices, together with a multiple-choice generalization. As a key ingredient, we prove the existence of a $(q, 1/(1+q))$-balanced contention resolution scheme for the integral knapsack polytope for every $q \in [0, 1]$, which may be of independent interest. The balance guarantee $1/(1+q)$ is tight in the worst case over all knapsack instances.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.