Extremal expectations in card guessing with partial feedback: proofs of two conjectures of Diaconis-Graham-Spiro

Abstract

We study the minimum and maximum expected scores over all adaptive strategies in sequential card guessing with yes/no feedback. A deck contains $n$ labels, each appearing $m$ times, and is shuffled uniformly. The cards are guessed one at a time, and after each guess the player is told only whether it was correct. Always guessing the same label gives exactly $m$ points. How far can the expected score depart from $m$ if all previous feedback is used either to seek or to avoid correct guesses? Diaconis, Graham, and Spiro conjectured that the minimum expectation is $m-o(m)$ as $m\to\infty$ with $n$ sufficiently large in terms of $m$, and that, for each fixed $m$, the limit superior of the maximum expectation as $n\to\infty$ is at most $(e-1)m$. Writing these extrema as $P^-_{m,n}$ and $P^+_{m,n}$, we prove \[ 0\le m-P^-_{m,n}\le3m^{3/4} \qquad(n\ge m\ge1), \] and the finite-parameter bound \[ \frac{P^+_{m,n}}m\le\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac1{k!}<e-1 \] for all positive integers $m,n$. The first bound gives a first-order asymptotic uniform in $n\ge m$; the universal constant $e-1$ in the second cannot be reduced. Thus both conjectures follow. The lower bound combines a switching comparison for restricted permutations with martingale second-moment estimates. For the upper bound, we represent the repeated cards as a random interleaving of independent decks of distinct cards and prove that the optimal expectation is additive when the component-deck labels are revealed.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.