Testing cosmic acceleration from thermogravity without vacuum energy

Abstract

We present a first background-level observational test of a thermogravity theory in which the Einstein equations are clipped to a trace-free version, the cosmological constant $Λ$ does not gravitate, and controlled violations of energy conservation obstruct the usual reinstatement of $Λ$ as an integration constant. We therefore set $Λ=0$ and ask whether late-time acceleration can instead be generated solely by energy non-conservation, with no extra background parameter relative to flat $Λ\mathrm{CDM}$. We contrast a minimal universal implementation with a model in which only CDM partakes in non-conservation. The universal model is strongly disfavored when combining Supernovae and BAO distances, with the inclusion of DESI BAO worsening the fit by $Δχ^2\simeq 51$ relative to $Λ\mathrm{CDM}$, because matter creation ties the intermediate-redshift normalization of $H(z)$ too rigidly to the present acceleration. This conclusion, however, should be interpreted with caution, since universal non-conservation would modify the observational dictionary itself. By contrast, restricting non-conservation to CDM leaves baryonic and photon observables unaffected at the background level and therefore allows a self-contained analysis. The resulting $ξ\mathrm{CDM}$ model, which can be thought of as a one parameter extension of $Λ\mathrm{CDM}$, provides an improved fit relative to $Λ\mathrm{CDM}$ for the background dataset combinations considered, with improvements reaching $Δχ^2=-4.85$ and a maximum Bayesian preference of $\ln\mathcal{B}=2.77$. However, when the BAO ruler is calibrated using BBN or CMB information, the reduced effective early-time CDM density increases the sound horizon and drives $H_0$ towards lower values, thereby increasing rather than alleviating the tension with the distance-ladder calibration.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.