Beyond gas dwarfs and water worlds: hybrid envelopes among the M-dwarf sub-Neptunes characterised with JWST

Abstract

Sub-Neptunes orbiting M dwarfs are commonly interpreted either as rocky cores beneath primordial H/He envelopes (gas dwarfs) or as volatile-rich bodies formed beyond the water-ice line (water worlds). Because the two are degenerate in mass and radius once envelope evolution is treated self-consistently, the atmospheric mean molecular weight $μ$ is the more direct discriminant. We compile the eight M-dwarf sub-Neptunes with published JWST transmission spectra and a constraint on $μ$, grade each constraint by the quality of the underlying evidence, and combine it with the restricted Jeans parameter and with energy-limited escape integrated over the system lifetime, using XUV histories from M-dwarf activity-age relations. Planets are classified by what their present composition implies about their origin. At the $μ= 3.8$ amu threshold adopted in the gas-dwarf literature, four planets fit neither end-member: their envelopes ($3.8 < μ\le 18$ amu) are too heavy for primordial H/He, yet neither their composition nor their escape history requires a volatile-rich origin. Two of these assignments rest on molecular detections (LP 791-18 c and TOI-270 d) and two on bounded or conditional metallicities. One planet, LHS 1140 b, requires a volatile-rich origin; one, TOI-776 c, is tentatively a gas dwarf; two remain ambiguous. We propose the term hybrid worlds for the intermediate class, whose envelopes can be produced by magma-ocean equilibration, supercritical miscibility, preferential hydrogen loss or accretion interior to the ice line. The count depends on the adopted threshold (three planets at 5 amu, one at 10 amu), but no threshold leaves both end-member classes physically consistent. The sample is set by JWST target selection, so these fractions are not occurrence rates; a homogeneous survey testing whether $μ$ is bimodal would test the proposed class directly.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.