Toward Reliable Patient-Specific Aortic Strain Mapping from 4D CTA: Validation, Spectral Structure, and Clinical Potential

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a framework for spatially resolved ascending aortic strain estimation from 4D computed tomography angiography (CTA) and characterize reliability across segmentation sources and spatial scales. Methods: We constructed patient-specific aortic strain maps using nnU-Net segmentation, optimized surface remeshing, deformable registration, and mesh-based strain estimation. Finite element (FE)-derived synthetic 4D CT sequences provided controlled reference deformations for registration validation. Strain reliability was characterized across segmentation sources and Laplace-Beltrami (LB) spectral scales. Associations with diameter, aortic height index (AHI), and age were assessed. Results: Registration-derived median strain showed minimal bias relative to FE-reference strain for observer-derived (0.0013) and nnU-Net-derived meshes (0.0056). Median strain exhibited low bias and narrow 95% limits of agreement (LoA) across segmentation sources (interobserver: bias = -0.0045, LoA [-0.0490, 0.0399]; nnU-Net versus observer: bias = -0.0052, LoA [-0.0340, 0.0237]). Differences were greater for 95th-percentile strain, particularly in the interobserver comparison. LB spectral analysis showed preferential preservation of low-frequency strain organization, with k = 5 reconstructions reducing segmentation-related disagreement by 52-56%. The 95th-percentile areal strain was inversely associated with maximum ascending aortic diameter (r = -0.493, p = 0.005), AHI (r = -0.488, p = 0.005), and age (r = -0.479, p = 0.006). Three high-grade AR cases showed heterogeneous regional strain patterns. Conclusion: This framework reproducibly estimates ascending aortic strain from 4D CTA, characterizes its reliability across segmentation sources and spatial scales, and demonstrates its potential for noninvasive assessment of patient-specific aortic mechanics.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.