Relaxation Dark Energy: Compositional Dynamics and the Future of Cosmic Acceleration

Abstract

If cosmic acceleration is driven by a positive cosmological constant, the universe approaches an eternally accelerating de Sitter state, whose interpretation in quantum gravity remains elusive. We develop a framework in which acceleration is instead a transient stage of dark-sector relaxation towards compositional equilibrium: matter and dark energy approach a stationary density ratio, eventually diluting like pressureless matter. Guided by linear response theory and Onsager's near-equilibrium regression hypothesis, we describe this evolution through a composition variable measuring departure from equilibrium. Extending constant fractional relaxation to the full background evolution yields the dark-energy equation of state $w=w_0a^{-n}$, where $n$ is the relaxation rate per e-fold of expansion. This history connects early dark-energy suppression, an upward phantom crossing and a density maximum to a pressureless scaling future. Using DESI DR2 BAO and Planck distance priors, with and without three alternative supernova compilations, we find a nominal $2.6$--$3.6σ$ preference for nonzero relaxation over constant $w$. The composition framework also motivates a constitutive prescription for linear perturbations that remains regular at phantom crossing. Near equilibrium, regular long-wavelength composition disturbances relax at the background rate to leading order, while small-scale fluctuations propagate as damped sound waves. We prove, however, that for separately conserved matter and dark energy, the pointwise constitutive relation cannot sustain a regular, gradient-stable negative-pressure branch throughout its full past evolution. We explore modifications of the pressure response and their consistency with neighbouring homogeneous histories, identifying requirements for extending the near-equilibrium description to the full cosmological evolution.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.