$ν$Gundam: a unified framework for point-redshift and PDF-aware spatial correlation functions

Abstract

Context. Photometric-redshift uncertainties redistribute galaxy pairs along the line of sight (LOS), diluting spatial clustering measurements. Propagating full redshift probability density functions (PDFs) through standard pair-count estimators remains computationally demanding. Aims. We present $ν$Gundam, a unified framework to propagate radial PDFs at the pair-count level while retaining a common interface for exact, compressed, and stochastic projected-clustering calculations. Methods. The code implements four modes: exact empirical-PDF integration, Gaussian-mixture compression, Monte Carlo (MC) sampling, and a quantile-compression method. All modes accumulate pair counts on a resolved ($r_\mathrm{p},π$) grid, from which $ξ(r_\mathrm{p},π)$ and $w_\mathrm{p}(r_\mathrm{p};Π)$ are reconstructed. We validate these with DESI galaxies and CosmoDC2 mocks. Results. The PDF-aware modes produce nearly indistinguishable LOS redistribution kernels, while point-photo-$z$ estimates discard probabilistic pair information. Radial uncertainty mainly redistributes the clustering signal to larger $π$; the depth required to recover the truth projection scales with the pairwise radial dispersion. For practical settings, MC, quantile, and Gaussian-mixture compression reproduce the exact result with fractional RMS residuals below 5%. Applied to DESI Bright Galaxy Survey samples, MC sampling recovers spectroscopic clustering shapes and relative amplitudes for $r_\mathrm{p}\gtrsim0.8\,h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ using sample-dependent recovery depths of ~400 and ~$180\,h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ for red and blue galaxies. Conclusions. Projected clustering with redshift PDFs is a pair-redistribution problem. When propagated consistently, the signal is recovered accurately and efficiently. The integration depth is sample dependent and should be part of the measurement definition rather than a fixed choice.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.