Modeling MAD Sgr A* flares and their dependence on spin

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to place constraints on the spin of Sgr A* from recent flare observations. It models the flare kinematics in the vicinity of a supermassive black hole, evaluates their dependence on black hole spin, and assesses the correlation between the spin of the black hole and the astrometric observations in the Galactic center. Methods: Our study extends the work of Antonopoulou et al. 2025 to a range of black hole spins. A prominent flux eruption is identified in the simulation, and the evolution of the active region on the equatorial plane is tracked during the event. The flare model consists of a spherical hot spot ejected along the flux tube with a relativistic velocity. Results: In MAD simulations, the flux tube wraps around the jet funnel in the opposite direction to the black hole's spin. This dependence is imprinted on the flare trajectory and provides a strong correlation between the spin of the black and the flare kinematics. This analysis favors Kerr black holes, with a preference towards larger spin magnitude. Although prograde simulations show a consistent clockwise motion in the sky regardless of disk rotation, retrograde models require a clockwise accretion disk to account for the observations of July 22, 2018. Conclusions: A maximally rotating Kerr black hole is the most promising candidate for reproducing the observed flare trajectory in the vicinity of Sgr A*, illustrating a pass faction surpassing $90\%$ among the investigated flare models. In particular, determining spin orientation within this model is linked to the rotation of the accretion disk. Assuming a counterclockwise accretion disk, a prograde black hole with $a\geq1/2$ is able to reproduce the observed flare kinematics in the Galactic center. Conversely, assuming a clockwise rotation for the disk, the observations support both prograde and retrograde Kerr black holes with a large spin.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.