Assessing the consistency of the CPL dark-energy model with cosmological data: Simulation-calibrated neural posterior disagreement

Abstract

Recent DESI observations hint at a preference for dynamical dark energy with an equation of state that crosses the phantom divide within the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parameterization. In this work, we assess the consistency of the CPL parameterization with current cosmological observations. We develop a model check based on the disagreement between posteriors inferred by neural posterior estimation and flow-matching posterior estimation. Both estimators are trained on the same CPL simulations, and their posterior disagreement is calibrated using independent simulations to obtain a global $p$-value. Controlled simulations assess the reliability of the calibrated \(p\)-values and show how detection sensitivity depends on the form of departure from the assumed model. Applying the test to the compressed CMB+DESI+DESY5 data vector yields $p_{\rm global}=0.524$, indicating that the current observations are consistent with the CPL model. The method has a median evaluation time of only $0.53\,{\rm s}$, enabling efficient assessments of cosmological model adequacy. This framework enables efficient tests of dark-energy models, providing a firmer basis for investigating the physical origin of cosmic acceleration.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.