Abstract
VICReg prevents collapse with a hinge on the standard deviation of each embedding dimension, and its authors argue from the gradient that a hinge on the variance would fail. To our knowledge, this claim has not been tested experimentally. We test it in a controlled setting (ResNet-18, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100), changing only the hinge and sweeping its weight $μ$ over five orders of magnitude. At the default weight ($μ= 1$), the two hinges reach the same linear-probe accuracy on CIFAR-10 (about 89.5%). Both collapse below a threshold weight, but the standard-deviation hinge's threshold is 35-130$\times$ lower. CIFAR-100 shows a consistent gap. In training, the variance hinge's gradient fades as the feature variance shrinks, while the standard-deviation hinge's does not until that variance is very small. The standard-deviation hinge therefore buys a safety margin: it keeps training at weights far below the point where the variance hinge collapses.
Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.
Record
- Archive ID
- arxiv:2610.32630
- Published
- Oct 23, 2026
- arXiv
- 2610.32630
- Categories
- cs.LG
- Provenance
- arxiv