Comparative analysis of tungsten armor and a liquid-lithium film as first walls for the HiPER laser-fusion chamber: thermal response, vapor shielding and helium transmission to the steel

Abstract

Tungsten armor and liquid-metal films, the usual sacrificial first walls of laser-fusion chambers, were modeled separately. Both go through one calculation for the three HiPER scenarios: NRL 154 MJ spectra scaled by yield, binned to keep each ion species' number and energy, a common deposition model, and a one-dimensional enthalpy solver with melting, evaporation and parameterized vapor shielding. In Demo (154 MJ, 6.5 m, 10 Hz), a 1 mm tungsten armor peaks 378 K below melting without neutron heating (275-319 K with it). A degraded near-surface conductivity can erase this margin, which also depends on the ion-spectra construction. The steel interface exceeds the 925 K limit, and the surface accumulates the 10^18-10^19 m^-2 helium fluences associated with the onset of surface modification within 10-98 shots (not a lifetime). A lithium film keeps the steel below 925 K from 44 um and below the 873 K compatibility limit from 56 um, more with partial renewal. Burn ions then implant helium; keeping the steel below 10^18 m^-2 for 10^6 shots needs 184 um, which binds in every scenario. The film evaporates 7.4x10^-4 kg m^-2 per shot (range 4.2-8.4x10^-4 kg m^-2, full renewal). Vapor shielding, with a nearly un-ionized vapor (Saha estimate), changes this by -21 % to +5 % for the Saha-supported stopping factor s = 1 and -34 % to +8 % across s = 1-2. Both walls are thermally viable in Prototype and marginal for tungsten in Demo. The deciding issues are tungsten damage evolution, lithium film survival and chamber clearing.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.