Structural-Test Geometry as an Inductive Bias for Partially Observable World Models

Abstract

Predictive world-model objectives need not organize latent histories according to distinctions required for later control. With privileged simulator access during training, should response-derived structural information be predicted, decoded, or imposed directly on latent geometry--and how do these choices compare with structured belief distillation? We define posterior-marginalized structural tests whose response distributions induce a pseudometric over histories, then train quotient-preserving (QP) world models by aligning shared latent Euclidean distances to that metric. Across a fixed six-task diagnostic suite, the largest differences appear under held-out structural variation: QP improves planning success by 26.1 points $[21.5,30.7]$ over metric decoding and 6.4 points $[3.8,9.0]$ over structured belief distillation. On GridWorld, metric decoding accurately recovers held-out structural distances ($ρ=.91$) while its native latent geometry remains more distorted than QP's (paired IQD difference $.22$ $[.20,.24]$), showing that relational recoverability and direct geometric alignment can diverge.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.