The accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR

Nicholas Fowler, Michael P. Williamson

View at source ↗PDF ↗Article104 citations

Abstract

In the recent Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) competition, AlphaFold2 performed outstandingly. Its worst predictions were for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures, which has two alternative explanations: either the NMR structures were poor, implying that Alpha-Fold may be more accurate than NMR, or there is a genuine difference between crystal and solution structures. Here, we use the program Accuracy of NMR Structures Using RCI and Rigidity (ANSURR), which measures the accuracy of solution structures, and show that one of the NMR structures was indeed poor. We then compare Alpha-Fold predictions to NMR structures and show that Alpha-Fold tends to be more accurate than NMR ensembles. There are, however, some cases where the NMR ensembles are more accurate. These tend to be dynamic structures, where Alpha-Fold had low confidence. We suggest that Alpha-Fold could be used as the model for NMR-structure refinements and that Alpha-Fold structures validated by ANSURR may require no further refinement.

Abstract of "The accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR" by Nicholas Fowler, Michael P. Williamson, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005, used under its Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY); markup removed, otherwise unmodified.

Record

Archive ID
doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005
Published
May 9, 2022
Venue
Structure
DOI
10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005
PubMed
35537451
PMC
PMC9592556
Categories
Protein Structure and Dynamics
License
cc-by
Provenance
openalex+europepmc

Topics