Inferring and validating mechanistic models of neural microcircuits based on spike-train data

Josef Ladenbauer, Sam McKenzie, Daniel Fine English, Olivier Hagens, Srdjan Ostojic

View at source ↗PDF ↗Article39 citations

Abstract

The interpretation of neuronal spike train recordings often relies on abstract statistical models that allow for principled parameter estimation and model selection but provide only limited insights into underlying microcircuits. In contrast, mechanistic models are useful to interpret microcircuit dynamics, but are rarely quantitatively matched to experimental data due to methodological challenges. Here we present analytical methods to efficiently fit spiking circuit models to single-trial spike trains. Using derived likelihood functions, we statistically infer the mean and variance of hidden inputs, neuronal adaptation properties and connectivity for coupled integrate-and-fire neurons. Comprehensive evaluations on synthetic data, validations using ground truth in-vitro and in-vivo recordings, and comparisons with existing techniques demonstrate that parameter estimation is very accurate and efficient, even for highly subsampled networks. Our methods bridge statistical, data-driven and theoretical, model-based neurosciences at the level of spiking circuits, for the purpose of a quantitative, mechanistic interpretation of recorded neuronal population activity.

Abstract of "Inferring and validating mechanistic models of neural microcircuits based on spike-train data" by Josef Ladenbauer, Sam McKenzie, Daniel Fine English et al., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12572-0, used under its Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY); markup removed, otherwise unmodified.

Record

Archive ID
doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12572-0
Published
Oct 30, 2019
Venue
Nature Communications
DOI
10.1038/s41467-019-12572-0
PubMed
31666513
Categories
Neural dynamics and brain function
License
cc-by
Provenance
openalex

Topics