A comprehensive benchmarking with practical guidelines for cellular deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics

Li H, Zhou J, Li Z, Chen S, Liao X, Zhang B, Zhang R, Wang Y, Sun S, Gao X

View at source ↗PDF ↗Article215 citations

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics technologies are used to profile transcriptomes while preserving spatial information, which enables high-resolution characterization of transcriptional patterns and reconstruction of tissue architecture. Due to the existence of low-resolution spots in recent spatial transcriptomics technologies, uncovering cellular heterogeneity is crucial for disentangling the spatial patterns of cell types, and many related methods have been proposed. Here, we benchmark 18 existing methods resolving a cellular deconvolution task with 50 real-world and simulated datasets by evaluating the accuracy, robustness, and usability of the methods. We compare these methods comprehensively using different metrics, resolutions, spatial transcriptomics technologies, spot numbers, and gene numbers. In terms of performance, CARD, Cell2location, and Tangram are the best methods for conducting the cellular deconvolution task. To refine our comparative results, we provide decision-tree-style guidelines and recommendations for method selection and their additional features, which will help users easily choose the best method for fulfilling their concerns.

Abstract of "A comprehensive benchmarking with practical guidelines for cellular deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics" by Li H, Zhou J, Li Z et al., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37168-7, used under its Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY); markup removed, otherwise unmodified.

Record

Archive ID
doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37168-7
Published
Mar 21, 2023
Venue
Nature communications
DOI
10.1038/s41467-023-37168-7
PubMed
36941264
PMC
PMC10027878
License
CC-BY
Provenance
europepmc

Topics