Evaluating AlphaFold Tools and Related Scoring Functions for Protein-peptide Complex Prediction

Abstract

Determining the three-dimensional structures of protein-peptide complexes is crucial for elucidating biological processes and designing peptide-based drugs. Protein-peptide docking has become essential for predicting complex structures. AlphaFold-Multimer, ColabFold, and AlphaFold3 are groundbreaking tools that enhance protein-peptide docking accuracy. In this study, we evaluated these three tools for predicting protein-peptide complex structures in both template-based (TB) and template-free (TF) modes. AlphaFold-Multimer excels in TB predictions and performs moderately in TF scenarios in the prediction pool; however, TF outperforms TB in the first-ranked models. ColabFold demonstrates versatility in both TB and TF settings. AlphaFold3 generates high-quality structures for more proteins, but its medium-accuracy predictions are not as good as those of AlphaFold-Multimer using a large model pool. We also assessed the performance of various scoring functions in ranking predicted protein-peptide complex structures. While the scoring function built in AlphaFold demonstrates the best performance, some other scoring functions, e.g., FoldX-Stability and HADDOCK-mdscore, provide complementary information for model ranking. These findings suggest the potential for enhancing scoring functions targeting AlphaFold-based predictions by combining multiple scoring functions or using a consensus approach from many prediction models.

Abstract of "Evaluating AlphaFold Tools and Related Scoring Functions for Protein-peptide Complex Prediction" by Manshour N, Ren JZ, Esmaili F et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzag026, used under its Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY); markup removed, otherwise unmodified.