Practical Resources for Enhancing the Reproducibility of Mechanistic Modeling in Systems Biology

Michael L. Blinov, John H. Gennari, Jonathan R. Karr, Ion I. Moraru, David P. Nickerson, Herbert M. Sauro

View at source ↗PDF ↗Article14 citations

Abstract

Although reproducibility is a core tenet of the scientific method, it remains challenging to reproduce many results. Surprisingly, this also holds true for computational results in domains such as systems biology where there have been extensive standardization efforts. For example, Tiwari et al. recently found that they could only repeat 50% of published simulation results in systems biology. Toward improving the reproducibility of computational systems research, we identified several resources that investigators can leverage to make their research more accessible, executable, and comprehensible by others. In particular, we identified several domain standards and curation services, as well as powerful approaches pioneered by the software engineering industry that we believe many investigators could adopt. Together, we believe these approaches could substantially enhance the reproducibility of systems biology research. In turn, we believe enhanced reproducibility would accelerate the development of more sophisticated models that could inform precision medicine and synthetic biology.

Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.

Record

Archive ID
arxiv:2104.04604
Published
Apr 9, 2021
Venue
Current Opinion in Systems Biology
DOI
10.1016/j.coisb.2021.06.001
arXiv
2104.04604
Categories
q-bio.QM, q-bio.CB, q-bio.MN
Provenance
arxiv

Topics